No, because the judge ruled that the training was fair use and the model itself wasn't infringing.

That sounds pretty applicable to this case, right? _Access_ to the Claude is illicit, but distilling is not. Distilling is fair use.

Probably yes. Maybe that's one of the reasons they're not suing them.

Have you a source for that? Because everyhthing I've read tells me that they paid out a settlement but no mention of deleting the training data or the models that were tainted, e.g. [0]

[0] https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/sep/05/anthropic...